The insight, or at least the statement, that those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it (with some variation in words used), has been attributed to several figures of note in our history. George Santayana, Winston Churchill and Edmund Burke are some of those who are said to have made this claim. The statement implies that those who know history aren't doomed to repeat it. That may be true, but it remains the case that they may repeat history or are even likely to do so; they're just not doomed to do so.
The fact is that we repeat ourselves, in more ways than one. Repetition is a constant in our affairs. Repetition is even said to be useful in some respects. It may strengthen memory or memorization, for example. It may in ways not entirely clear to me guide us to concentrate in meditation, as in the use of a mantra, which in turn in ways not entirely clear to me may guide us to wisdom or enlightenment. On the other hand, it may bore or annoy us. But we do it. As I've said (though not yet repeatedly).
But the claim, I believe, promises too much if only by implication, and is in that sense misleading. Merely knowing history does very little for us. History may be taught each minute of the day in schools of all sorts and we may even remember the history we're taught, but knowledge of history doesn't necessarily translate to knowledge of human nature, or provide lessons in how to conduct ourselves now and later, unless we're also taught to think.
We're not taught to think, particularly in elementary and high schools as they're called here in our Great Republic. Perhaps it's more accurate to claim that those who don't know how to think are doomed to repeat history.
For example, the danger posed by demagogues, and the tricks employed by them to sway people and even to commit violence, has been known and been the subject of study since the 5th century B.C.E., and perhaps even earlier. We know of Cleon, Alcibiades, Publius Clodius Pulcher from ancient times, religious rabble-rousers from medieval times, the fanatics of the French Revolution like Marat, and of course more recently Mussolini, Hitler, McCarthy and Huey Long, and demagogues are rife in our current politics. Most of us know at least some of the members of this rogues gallery, and at least some of what they did, and it makes no significant difference to their--repetition. Demagogues abide.
I think of the demagogue as an example of our propensity to repeat history because it's that time of year in our Glorious Union when politicians vie for our favor in what we're pleased to call elections. Perhaps there are parts of the country where TV, the Internet, and all other forms of media are not crowded with political appeals, but in the place where I reside those appeals are ceaseless, and omnipresent. And there can be no better examples of demagoguery than these appeals. Sanctimony, fear-mongering, pandering, polarizing tactics, misrepresentations, evasiveness, lying, appeals to emotion, authority and bigotry...all of the usual characteristics of this practice are present in abundance. The appeals are incessant.
It's at least possible, and more likely probable, that those bombarded by this treacle, by these disingenuous if not outright dishonest commercials made by and for glorified carnival barkers, are aware of demagogues of the past and may even think them despicable. But their ubiquity indicates that they're effective (they cost money, and money is most important), and if they're effective that indicates that our knowledge of history be damned, were doomed to repeat it.
I tend to agree with John Dewey's insight that we only think when confronted with problems. Otherwise, we act based largely on habits accrued over a lifetime. But we must believe a problem exists before we have recourse to thought, i.e. the use and application of intelligence.
We don't believe repeating the mistakes of the past is a problem, unfortunately. Perhaps we believe we're doomed to repeat the past no matter how much we're aware of it.
We know history or don't, AND are doomed to repeat it regardless.
No comments:
Post a Comment