I have a recollection of Conservatism in American politics and culture. It may be outdated; it may be inaccurate, but it seems quite clear. While it was characterized by a respect for tradition and authority, it also respected individual freedom. Freedom from government interference in the thoughts and lives of individuals, specifically.
While its fetishization of the past and accepted customs made it-over suspicious of change and too willing to tolerate established injustices, it was possible to acknowledge its merits because, at least in theory, it abjured autocracy and totalitarianism. That's no longer the case with respect to what passes for Conservatism today.
Nor do those who pass for conservatives now have any concern for the freedom of individuals from the control of government. On the contrary, they apparently favor government control, provided they find the government favorable. As long as that's the case they seem entirely willing to ignore the restrictions of the powers of government the Founding Fathers built into the foundations of our Great Republic.
This is an extremely selfish and short-sighted position for them to take. They sanction the unrestricted imposition of control by a regime they disfavor which might replace the current regime. Thomas More said something to the effect that he would give the devil protection of the law to protect himself from the depredations of government. It's difficult to believe that those who call themselves conservatives now lack this wisdom.
It's unclear whether this willingness to see the power of government used to restrict individual liberty is the result of self-indulgence on their part, or fear, or some other irrational motivation. It may be, though, that H.L. Mencken was right and they value security far more than they value liberty.
That security likely is, for them, security from the freedom of others to do and think as they believe to be appropriate. This would explain their toleration of if not support for government intrusion in education and regulation of lifestyles, heath, art and entertainment; even of history, Soviet-style.
It's a strange sort of Conservatism that seeks to radically increase the powers of a central government to regulate and curtail life and liberty in what has, traditionally, considered itself to be "the land of the free."
No comments:
Post a Comment